Writing
Assessement Criteria
Damon
Gitelman, Ph.D. |
|
|
Holistic Scoring:
Writing samples are evaluated in terms of a stated purpose, in which the
student is asked to compose an essay that may be persuasive, descriptive,
or both. Focused holistic scoring is designed to evaluate the overall
quality of the student's writing, examining specific characteristics such
as organization, unity, and mechanical conventions. This scoring system
describes the overall effectiveness of these characteristics.
A writing sample
is evaluated on the success of its total impression, rather than in terms
of its individual component parts considered in isolation. Below are scores
that samples may receive, and the criteria for those scores: |
|
4 -
a well-formed writing sample that effictively communicates a whole message
to a specified audience
• The writer maintains unity of a developed topic throughout the
writing sample and establishes a focus by clearly stating a purpose.
• The writer exhibits control in the development of ideas and clearly
specifies supporting detail.
• Sentence structure is effective and free of errors.
• Choice of words is precise, and usage is careful.
• The writer shows mastery of mechanical conventions such as spelling
and punctuation. |
|
3
- an adequately-formed writing sample that attempts to communicate a message
to a specified audience
• The focus and purpose of the writing sample may be clear, but
the writer's attempts to develop supporting details may not be fully realized.
• The writer's organization of ideas may be ambiguous, incomplete,
or partially ineffective.
• Sentence structure within paragraphs is adequate, but minor errors
in sentence structure, usage, and word choice are evident.
• There may also be errors in the use of mechanical conventions,
such as spelling and punctuation. |
|
2 - a partially
developed writing sample in which the characteristics of effective written
communication are only partly formed.
• The statement of purpose is not clear, and, although a main idea
or topic may be announced, focus on the main idea is not sustained.
• Ideas may be developed by the use of specific supporting detail,
and the writer may make an effort to organize and sequence ideas, but development
and organization are largely incomplete or unclear.
• Paragraphs contain poorly structured sentences with noticeable and
distracting errors.
• The writer exhibits imprecision in usage and word choice, and a
lack of control of mechanical conventions such as spelling and punctuation.
|
|
1 - an
inadequately formed writing sample that fails to communicate a complete
message
• The writer attempts to address the topic, but language and style
may be inappropriate for the given audience, purpose, and/or occasion.
• There is often no clear statement of a main idea, and the writer's
efforts to present supporting detail are confused.
• Any organization that is present fails to present an effective sequence
of ideas.
• Sentence structure is ineffective and few sentences are free of
errors.
• Usage and word choice are imprecise.
• The writer makes many errors in the use of mechanical conventions
such spelling and punctuation. |
|
0 - The response if
off topic, illegible, or it is not of sufficient length to score |
|
CHARACTERISTICS OF ADEQUATE WRITING |
CHARACTERISTIC |
ADEQUATE
|
INADEQUATE |
1. Appropriateness |
Topic addressed using
language appropriate for audience, purpose, and occasion. |
Topic addressed using
language inappropriate for audience, purpose, and occasion. |
2. Unity and Focus |
Topic/main idea is clearly
stated and adequately maintained. |
Main idea is not clearly
or adequately stated. Continued focus on main idea is not evident.
|
3. Development |
The details presented
support the main idea. |
The supporting details
are incomplete or unclear. |
4. Organization |
Points of discussion are
reasonably organized. |
Points of discussion are
inadequately organized. |
5. Sentence Structure |
Sentence construction
is relatively free of noticeable and distracting errors. |
Sentences are poorly structured,
or contain noticeable and distracting errors. |
6. Usage |
Word usage is adequate
and words are chosen with precision. |
Words are poorly chosen
and/or improperly used. |
7. Mechanical
Conventions |
Writer adequately follows
the conventions of spelling, punctuation, and capitalization. |
Errors in mechanical conventions
are noticeable and distracting. |
|
|
|
|
|